Internal communications advisory

The communication isn't where the work starts. The decision is.

I help communications and people leaders turn consequential business decisions into coordinated execution. We examine the decision, how it will be governed, what behavior must change, how alignment will cascade through the organization, and what employees are telling us along the way. When something is breaking, we start with a focused diagnostic. Then we build what the evidence says the organization needs.

You can see the symptoms. The breakdown usually started upstream.

01

M&A or organizational integration

The announcement landed. Now leaders, managers, and employees are receiving different answers. The integration needs a communication architecture that can carry uncertainty, labor-sensitive requirements, and decisions that will keep changing.

02

Trust has dropped during transformation

More content will not repair a credibility problem. Leaders need an honest cadence, commitments need owners, and employees need to see the organization close the loop.

03

The IC function cannot carry the demand

Requests arrive from everywhere, priorities shift by influence, and the team is measured on output. The function needs governance, decision rights, a channel model, manager enablement, and a measurement baseline.

04

A critical change cannot fail at the manager handoff

Managers need context, boundaries, likely questions, and a clear route for answers before the employee conversation begins.

Start with a focused diagnostic. Build what the evidence says the organization needs.

01 | Fixed scope

Diagnostic

Typical duration: Two to three weeks

A fast, evidence-based view of the decision, governance, behavior, cascade, and employee response—showing what is breaking, what is at risk, and what needs attention first.

  • Executive and team interviews
  • Plan, channel, and message review
  • Stakeholder and handoff map
  • Risk and readiness assessment
  • Priorities and executive readout
02 | Defined by evidence

Foundation build

Typical duration: Six to 10 weeks

We build the infrastructure the situation requires, from integration governance and manager cascades to a complete IC operating model.

  • Governance and decision rights
  • Leader and manager cascade
  • Audience and handoff architecture
  • Editorial and channel cadence
  • Commitment and measurement system
03 | Optional

Implementation and advisory

Typical duration: Three-month minimum

I stay close while the system meets real work, then transfer the capability to the internal team.

  • Rollout support
  • Executive advice
  • Manager preparation
  • Measurement and adaptation
  • Capability transfer

Clearer decisions. Stronger execution. Fewer commitments lost between leadership intent and organizational reality.

Leaders know what they own.Decisions, open questions, and the next communication are visible.
Managers are prepared earlier.Context and boundaries arrive before employees start asking questions.
Teams can prioritize demand.Decision rights replace influence and instinct as the operating model.
Commitments close.Owners, dates, feedback, and follow-up are built into the system.
Measurement informs action.Clarity, confidence, and behavior matter alongside reach.
Capability stays inside.The internal team receives the methods and tools needed to continue.

Built inside the decisions, tested through execution.

26 countries
~8,000 employees

Global M&A integration

Led the internal communications architecture through multiple years of integration, including executive cadence, manager enablement, governance, editorial planning, and feedback systems.

ENTERPRISE EXPERIENCE
50 eNPS
points

Trust restoration

Helped recover 50 employee net promoter score points over approximately one year while transformation continued.

MEASURED OVER APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR
IC function
built and led

IC function build

Built the operating model, governance, SharePoint intranet, executive communications, budget, and a fully remote global team.

EMBEDDED IN HR LEADERSHIP

The system matters because people have to carry it.

Access matters

Useful counsel requires access to the decision, its context, and the people accountable for carrying it.

Candor matters

We name uncertainty, constraints, and what the evidence actually shows before producing more content.

We build together

The people who will own the system help shape it, making the work more accurate now and more durable later.

Evidence changes the work

Measurement is there to improve the next decision, so the plan must adapt when employee response or operating reality changes.

The tools make the thinking visible. Judgment still leads.

The Cascade Tool Suite and Signal Suite encode parts of the systems I use to address recurring internal communications breakdowns, including manager preparation, prioritization, audience load, and measurement. They may support an engagement when they fit the problem, but they never substitute for context.

Trusted when the message is difficult and the stakes are real.

“I've had the pleasure of working with Heather as both her manager and peer, and what sets her apart is her ability to translate complex, often sensitive business decisions into communications that were clear, honest, and human. Whether she was supporting a major organizational change, a leadership transition, or a company-wide initiative, Heather is driven to strike the right tone, calm and direct when it mattered most, and always with the employee's perspective front and center.”

Anders Strothman
VP, Business Partner, Viasat

“Heather is a very knowledgeable and skilled communications professional who is able to digest the business climate and strategy to shape key messages that move the needle.”

Tracy Polzin, MA, SHRM-SCP
Vice President, People & Culture, Viasat

“Heather is an exceptional professional who can hit the ground running on a new business, build great client relationships and collaborate successfully with colleagues. Her ability to drive results across multiple programs simultaneously makes her an asset to any team.”

Laurinda Hoffman
Vice President, Waggener Edstrom

Senior advisory works best when there is access, sponsorship, and something real to change.

Strong fit

  • The problem has enterprise impact and executive sponsorship.
  • The internal team needs senior capacity, a clear system, or both.
  • Leaders are willing to name uncertainty and close commitments.
  • The organization wants capability transfer, not permanent dependence.

Probably not the right fit

  • Writing support without access to decisions or context.
  • A preselected solution that cannot change when the evidence says it should.
  • A need for a large execution agency or always-on production team.

Start with the situation, not a package

Tell me what is changing, where execution is breaking, and what cannot fail.

If a focused diagnostic is the right first step, we will define it. If it is not, I will say so.